مطالعات میان‌ رشته‌ای تمدنی  انقلاب اسلامی

مطالعات میان‌ رشته‌ای تمدنی انقلاب اسلامی

تبیین مفهوم پیشرفت در چهارچوب نظریه تمدنی مقام معظم رهبری: خوانشی تحلیلی از بیانیه گام دوم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکترای تخصصی، آینده پژوهی مطالعات سیاسی انقلاب اسلامی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران
2 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین علیه السلام، تهران، ایران
چکیده
در قرن معاصر، گفتمان مسلط توسعه- با خاستگاه غربی- با بازتعریف پارادایم پیشرفت در چارچوب مدرنیته، آن را به شاخصی جهان‌شمول برای سنجش وضعیت کشورها تبدیل نموده است. این پارادایم با تقلیل فرآیند توسعه به الگوی خطی غربی‌سازی، ضمن نادیده انگاشتن مبانی تمدنی- فرهنگی جوامع غیرغربی، معیارهای توسعه را منحصراً در شاخص‌های کمّی اقتصادی محدود ساخته است. چنین رویکردی نه‌تنها ابعاد هنجاری و عدالت بنیاد پیشرفت را مغفول می‌گذارد، بلکه با نفی تکثر الگوهای توسعه، نوعی امپریالیسم نظری را در عرصه مطالعات توسعه تثبیت نموده است. انقلاب اسلامی ایران با طرح گفتمان بدیل «پیشرفت اسلامی-ایرانی» و با شعار بنیادین استقلال تمدنی (نه شرقی، نه غربی)، مبانی معرفتی جدیدی در عرصه نظریه‌پردازی توسعه ارائه نموده است. این پژوهش با اتخاذ روش تحلیل مضمون و با تمرکز بر منظومه فکری مقام معظم رهبری، درصدد است مؤلفه‌های کلیدی الگوی پیشرفت اسلامی-ایرانی را در چارچوب نظریه تمدنی ایشان مورد واکاوی قرار دهد. یافته‌های تحقیق حاکی از آن است که پیشرفت «صیرورت نیل به حیات طیبه» تعریف می‌شود که در چارچوب نظریه تمدنی، حرکتی پویا، چندبعدی و غایت‌گرا را ترسیم می‌نماید. تطبیق ابعاد چهارگانه (فکر، علم، زندگی، معنویت) با مؤلفه‌های هفت‌گانه بیانیه گام دوم و ابعاد پیشرفت در تحلیل مضمون بیانات مقام معظم رهبری در مورد پیشرفت نشان می‌دهد که؛ چارچوب کلی پیشرفت کشور برگرفته از معنویت، فکر و علم و پژوهش است که در عرصه‌های مختلف زندگی می‌بایست ظهور و بروز داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Explaining the concept of progress within the framework of the Supreme Leader's civilizational theory: An analytical reading of the Second Step Manifesto of the Islamic Revolution

نویسندگان English

nafise akhavan nilchi 1
yaser zolfaghari 2
1 PhD Candidate in Futures Studies (Political Studies of the Islamic Revolution), Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Master of Management, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

In the contemporary century, the dominant discourse of development - with Western origins - has redefined the development paradigm within the framework of modernity, transforming it into a universal indicator for measuring the status of countries. By reducing the development process to a linear pattern of Westernization, this paradigm has limited development criteria exclusively to quantitative economic indicators, while ignoring the civilizational-cultural foundations of non-Western societies. Such an approach not only neglects the normative and justice-based dimensions of progress, but also, by denying the plurality of development models, has established a kind of theoretical imperialism in the field of development studies. The Islamic Revolution of Iran, by proposing an alternative discourse of "Islamic-Iranian progress" and with the fundamental slogan of civilizational independence ("neither Eastern nor Western"), has presented new epistemological foundations in the field of development theorizing. This research, adopting the Sterling content analysis method and focusing on the Supreme Leader’s intellectual system, seeks to analyze the key components of the Islamic-Iranian progress model within the framework of his civilizational theory. The research findings indicate that progress is defined as “the process of achieving a good life,” which, within the framework of civilizational theory, depicts a dynamic, multidimensional, and teleological movement. Matching the four dimensions (thought, science, life, spirituality) with the seven components of the Second Step Statement and the dimensions of progress in the content analysis of the Supreme Leader’s statements on progress shows that; the overall framework of the country’s progress is derived from spirituality, thought, science, and research, which must emerge and manifest in different areas of life.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Islamic-Iranian progress model
development
progress
theme analysis
the Second Step Manifesto of the Islamic Revolution

Smiley face

Abedi Jafari, Hassan; Taslimi, Mohammad Saeed; Faghihi, Abolhasan; Sheikhzadeh, Mohammad (2011), "Theme Analysis and Theme Network: A Simple and Efficient Method for Explaining Existing Patterns in Qualitative Data", Management Thought, Year 5, Issue 2.[In Persian]
Alavi, Parviz (2007), Political Communication, Tehran, Modern Sciences
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research.
Basirinia, Ali; Malakouti, Sajjad (2019); “Investigating the Role of Future Vision in Progress from the Perspective of the Second Step of the Revolution with an Emphasis on Internal and External Dimensions”, Quarterly Journal of Islamic Humanities Studies, No. 18.[In Persian]
Baudrillard, J. (1992). The Illusion of the End. Stanford University Press.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
Clifford, J. (1988). The Predicament of Culture. Harvard University Press.
Costanza, R. et al. (2009), Beyond GDP: The Need for New Measures of Progress, Boston University, https://www.bu.edu/pardee/files/documents/PP-004-GDP.pdf.
Faghihi, Abolhassan, Alizadeh, Mohsen (2005), Validity in Qualitative Research, Management Culture, Issue 9.[In Persian]
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish. Pantheon Books.
Giddens, Anthony (2000), Sociology, Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri, Tehran, Ney Publishing.[In Persian]
Golshani, Mehdi (2018), Production of Science within the Framework of the Monotheistic Worldview, "Second Step of the Revolution" File, KHAMENEI.IR.[In Persian]
Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Blackwell.
Hashemiyan, Fatemeh Sadat (1994) "The Position of Rationality in the Model of Islamic Progress Based on the Political Thought of the Supreme Leader (May God Protect Him)", Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Research, Volume 13, Issue 3.[In Persian]
Information website of the Office for the Preservation and Publication of the Works of His Eminence Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei. KHAMENEI.IR.[In Persian]
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press.
Khademi, Atefeh; Taghizadeh, Fatemeh, (2019), Conceptual Model of the Issue of Women in the Discourse of the Islamic Revolution (Case Study: Ayatollah Khamenei's Intellectual System), Women in Development and Politics, Volume 17, Issue 2.[In Persian]
Lyotard, J-F. (1979). The Postmodern Condition. Manchester University Press.
Mir Ahmadi, Mansour; Nazari, Mohammad Ali, (1998), article "Theory of Political Progress in the Thought of Ayatollah Khamenei" in the Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Research, Volume 11, Issue 1.[In Persian]
Molana, Hamid (1992), Passing from Modernity, translated by Younes Shakarkhah, Tehran, Center for Media Studies and Development.[In Persian]
Movahedi, Masoud (2004), Determining the Characteristics of Islamic National Culture, Tehran, Secretariat of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, Cultural Commission.[In Persian]
Nazarpour, Mohammad Naghi (1999), Values ​​and Development, Tehran, Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought.[In Persian]
Parsania, Hamid, (2006), Science and Philosophy, Tehran: Publication Organization of the Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought.[In Persian]
Qaraati, Mohsen (2004), Interpretation of Noor, Tehran: Cultural Center for Lessons from the Quran, 11th Edition.[In Persian]
Qazi Mirsaeed (2016), "The Concept of Development and Progress in the Thought of the Supreme Leader (Madzaleh)", Islamic Management Quarterly, Year 24, Issue 3.[In Persian]
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Sanchouli, Zeinab (2013), "Explanation of the Nature of the Iranian Islamic Pattern of Progress", Quarterly Journal of Studies of the Iranian Islamic Pattern of Progress, Year 2, Issue 3.[In Persian]
Sarabadani, Hossein et al. (2019), Islamic Theory of Social Justice; A New Interpretation from the Perspective of Contemporary Islamic Thinkers, Imam Sadeq University Press, Tehran.[In Persian]
Shahriari, Mohammad (2018). Philosophy of Being Revolutionary. Tehran: Software Movement affiliated with the Islamic Revolution Publications.[In Persian]
Taylor, Charles, (2006), The Three Boredoms of Modernity, translated by Heydar Shadi, Allameh Quarterly Journal, No. 12.[In Persian]
Timmuri, Ruhollah; Abdollahzadeh, Hassan; Kaveh Pishqadam, Mohammad Kazem (2012) “Definition of Progress and Ways to Achieve It from the Perspective of the Supreme Leader Based on the Discourse Theory of Laclau and Mouffe”, Political Studies in the Development of the Humanities, Volume 1, No. 1.[In Persian]
Yousefzadeh, Hassan (2016), "Requirements of Theorizing in the Field of Progress (With Emphasis on the Position of Anthropology)", Collection of Articles of the Fifth Conference on the Iranian Islamic Model of Progress.[In Persian]
 
دوره 5، شماره 18 - شماره پیاپی 18
فصل تابستان
تابستان 1405
صفحه 179-221

  • تاریخ دریافت 01 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 07 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 21 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 تیر 1405