گونه شناسی رویکردهای تولید علوم انسانی اسلامی با تاکید بر جریان های فکری معاصر جهان اسلام

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه ادیان، قم، ایران

چکیده

علوم انسانی، به عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین حوزه‌های علمی، به بررسی و تحلیل افکار، احساسات، کنش‌های انسانی و همچنین ساختارها و نظام‌های اجتماعی می‌پردازد. این علوم با هدف فهم عمیق‌تر انسان و جامعه، نقش کلیدی در پیشرفت فرهنگی، اجتماعی و اخلاقی بشریت ایفا می‌کند. در جهان اسلام، موضوع تولید علوم انسانی، به عنوان یکی از دغدغه‌های اصلی شماری از متفکران مطرح بوده است. پرسش اصلی نوشتار حاضر آن است که بر اساس اندیشه جریان های فکری معاصر جهان اسلام، چه رویکردهایی به تولید علوم انسانی در جهان اسلام وجود دارد؟ به بیان دیگر، نظام اندیشه‌ای هر جریان فکری معاصر در جهان اسلام، بر چه رویکردی به تولید علوم انسانی دلالت می‎کند؟ روش جمع‌آوری داده‌ها در تحقیق حاضر، اسنادی و روش تحلیل داده‌ها دلالت‌پژوهی ظهوری است. بنا بر یافته‌های تحقیق، می توان رویکردها به تولید علوم انسانی در جهان اسلام را بر اساس جریان های چهارگانه فکری معاصر جهان اسلام به چهار گونه تقلیدی، تهذیبی، تاسیسی و توقیفی تقسیم کرد. جریان تجددگرایی بر رویکرد تقلیدی، جریان تجددگرایی اسلامی بر رویکرد تهذیبی، جریان تمدن‌گرایی بر رویکرد تاسیسی (با تمامی رهیافت‌های گوناگون آن) و جریان سنت‌گرایی بر رویکرد توقیفی دلالت دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Typology of approaches to the production of humanities with emphasis on contemporary intellectual movements in the Islamic world

نویسنده [English]

  • Majid Mobini Moqaddas
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Religions, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

Humanities, as one of the most important scientific fields, examines and analyzes human thoughts, feelings, actions, as well as social structures and systems. These sciences play a key role in the cultural, social, and moral progress of humanity with the aim of a deeper understanding of man and society. In the Islamic world, the Islamization of these important sciences is one of the main concerns of a number of thinkers. The main question of the present article is what are the implications of the intellectual movements in the Islamic world on the subject of Islamic humanities? In other words, what implications will the ideological system of each intellectual movement in the Islamic world have in the field of producing Islamic humanities? The data collection method in the present study is documentary, and the data analysis method is emergent implication study. According to the research findings, the Islamic modernism movement implies a refinement approach, the civilizationism movement implies a production approach (with all its various approaches), and the traditionalism movement implies a containment approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intellectual movement
  • Islamic humanities
  • production of knowledge
  • modernism
  • Islamic modernism

Smiley face

Translated References to English
Avini, S.M. (2004). A Beginning on an End. Tehran: Saqi [in Persian].
Ebrahimipour, G., Mohebbi, M.A. (2015). Analysis of Approaches to Religious Science with Emphasis on Social Sciences. Cultural and Social Knowledge, (23), 95–118. [in Persian]
Arasta, M.J. (2013). The Role of Jurisprudence in the Development of Humanities. In the Development of Humanities, Vol. 3 (Lectures and Round Tables), Qom: Kitab Farda [in Persian].
Imam Khomeini. (2019). Imam's Sahifeh. Tehran: Oruj. [in Persian]
Bagheri, K. (2011). The Identity of Religious Science. Tehran: Printing and Publishing Organization. [in Persian]
Bostan, H. (2000). A Step Towards Religious Science. Qom: Seminary and University Research Institute, Vol. 1. [in Persian]
Bashirieh, H. (2001). Sociology of Modernity. Qom: Islamic Propaganda Office [in Persian].
Parsania, H. (2013). Theory and Culture: Fundamental Methodology for the Development of Scientific Theories. Cultural Strategy, Vol. 23, pp. 7–28. [in Persian]
Parsania, H. (2022). Philosophy and Method of Social Sciences. Qom: Book Garden [in Persian].
Todaro, M. (2003). Economic Development in the Third World. Translated by Gholam-Ali Farjadi, Tehran: Kohsar. [in Persian]
Jamali, M. (2016). Continuation of the Revolution in Which Narrative?. Qom: Modern Islamic Civilization. [in Persian]
Javadi Amoli, A. (1998). Sharia in the Mirror of Knowledge. Edited by Hamid Parsania, I, Qom: Asra Publishing Center [in Persian].
Hassani, S.H.R., Movahed Abtahi, S.M.T., Alipour, M. (2011). Religious Science; Views and Considerations, Second Edition, Qom: Hawza and University Research Institute. [in Persian]
Khosropanah, A. (2014). In Search of Islamic Humanities, Qom: Maarif Publishing House. [in Persian]
Khosropanah, A. (2015, November 13). “The Flow of Religious Science”, Iran Newspaper. [in Persian]
Khosropanah, A. (2022). The Flow of Thought in Contemporary Iran, Qom: Maarif Publishing House. [in Persian]
Danaeifard, H. (2016). “Methodology of Significance Studies in the Social and Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches and Implementation Stages”, Methodology of Humanities, Vol. 86, pp. 39–72. [in Persian]
Davari, R. (1984). A Glimpse of Our Westernization History (The Current State of Thought in Iran), Tehran: Soroush. [in Persian]
Sobhani, M.T. (2003). A Comprehensive Model of the Muslim Female Personality; Definitions and Structure, Qom: Women and Family Research Institute. [in Persian]
Sobhani, M.T. (2006). “An Introduction to the Flow of Religious Social Thought in Contemporary Iran (Part One)”, Naqed va Nazar, vol. 43-44, no. 11, pp. 279–311. [in Persian]
Sozanchi, H. (2009). Meaning, Possibility and Strategies for Realizing Religious Science, Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [in Persian]
Shaygan, D. (1993). Asia Against the West, Tehran: Amir Kabir. [in Persian]
Shojaei Jashouqani, M. (2021). “Traditionalists and the Problem of Science in Islamic Civilization (A Case Study of the Views of Cognitive Science by Dr. Seyyed Hossein Nasr)”, Quarterly Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 61–95 [in Persian].
Abdollahi, Y. (2015).“Modern Islamic Civilization from the Perspective of Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Seyyed Ahmad Fardid”, Islamic Civilization, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 94–115 [in Persian].
Majlisi, M.B. (1982). Bihar al-Anwar, 2nd edition, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turat al-Arabi. [in Persian]
Mohammadi, A. (2015). “The Flow of the Intellectual Front of Islamic Civilization”, Islamic Civilizational Thought, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 33-41. [in Persian]
Mesbah Yazdi, M.T. (2003). Philosophy Education, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [in Persian]
Motahari, M. (2009). Collection of Works, Tehran: Sadra. [in Persian]
Mehdinejad, S.R. (2022). “Civilizational Typology of Contemporary Intellectual Currents in the Islamic World”, Historical Studies of the Islamic World, Vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 123–147. [in Persian]
Movahed Abtahi, S.M.T. (2019). “Introduction and Evaluation of Classifications of Religious Science Approaches; A Step Towards a Comprehensive Classification of Religious Science Approaches”, Epistemological Studies at the Islamic University, Vol. 24, No. 82, pp. 5–24. [in Persian]
Mirbagheri, S.M.M. (2011). Cultural Dissection of the 88 Sedition, Qom: Kitab Farda. [in Persian]
Mirbagheri, S.M.M. (2013). The Flow of Islamic Humanities Production, in the Evolution of Humanities, Qom: Kitab Farda, Vol. 2, pp. 19–54. [in Persian]
Nasr, S.H. (2006). In Search of the Sacred (A Dialogue between Ramin Jahanbalgoo and Seyyed Hossein Nasr), translated by Seyyed Mostafa Shahrayini, Tehran: Nay Publishing House. [in Persian]