نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار، گروه غربشناسی، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In this paper- which is one of the parts of the philosophical research on the digital age - I evaluate a point of view that considers the claim of "the end of the current era" and "the beginning of the transition to a new era" as a kind of mythological and unsubstantiated view of the current situation. The words of the Internet world, the world of social networks, the world of computer games, the digital age, etc., are frequently used on the tongue and pen. In this area, I present a point of view that a student does not know the meaning of these interpretations, beyond the mythological meaning or newspaper usage. This objection is presented in three categories: 1. Criticism of political economy on the mythical view of the digital age. 2. Criticism of information history approach and 3. Criticism of computer ethics. The first two groups have similar principles and tone in criticizing the myth of the digital age, and the third group has emerged from the tradition of analytical ethics philosophy. Critics believe that there is exaggeration and exaggeration in the analysis of new favas, and there is nothing unique about this technology, and in treating the digital age as a myth, the thinker's relationship with history and politics has been severed. In Persian language, no research work has been written in criticism of the frequent term digital world or internet age. The English-language texts can be divided into three categories on this topic: 1. Exaggeration in the use of the word age or world 2. General opposition to its use 3. The moderate point of view that reaches a fundamental change with both exaggeration in use and lack of attention. Asr is the opposite. This article reflects the second and third views.
کلیدواژهها [English]